Social media has allowed everyday citizens to become authors,
editors, and publishers of news and information. Do you believe that social
media has increased the quality of news and information or decreased it?
Social media has drastically changed the
perspective of news, becoming a primary news source. Some audiences may turn to
the newspaper and others may turn to sources through social networking sites
such as, Twitter and Facebook (Boididou, Papadopoulos, Newman, Schifferes, &
Kompatsiaris, 2014) . When it comes to social media, we are
all very aware of how quickly anything can be posted and be seen by any audience.
Can we trust the pieces of information that gets leaked into the public? How do
we know if the quality of the content is valid? Where are the sources coming
from? (Boididou, Papadopoulos, Newman, Schifferes, &
Kompatsiaris, 2014) We all have to look closely and
carefully at the facts.
It gets me thinking to the point that
social media has decreased our quality of news, due to the fact that there is a
large scale of mis-information and false claims that proliferate rapidly
through social networks. In addition, anyone can become an author, or editor
leading to the publishing of incorrect information that it becomes difficult to
tell who created the original source in the first place (Seo, Mohapatra, & Abdelzaher) . I had come across
an article that discussed upon the wake of social media and its impact on news. According
to a study done by Pew Research, 70% of consumers retrieve most news links from
relatives and friends on Facebook, while 13% retrieved it from news journalists
(Mitchell, Rosentiel, & Christian, 2012) . Surprising isn’t
it? Think about it, most audiences are relying on Facebook for daily news
rather than going directly to the news website.

Nowadays, Facebook is a primary
example of shared news that eventually becomes a hoax, such as false celebrity
death rumours. An example was the Morgan Freeman death rumours that circulated
quickly, causing the creation of a fake Facebook tribute page titled, “R.I.P
Morgan Freeman,” reaching up to 1 million likes (Kelly, 2012) .

Another example of how social media
misleads information to individuals, led into the investigation of the perpetrators
of the Boston Marathon bombings (Boididou, Papadopoulos, Newman, Schifferes, &
Kompatsiaris, 2014) . Twitter users began to make wrongful
assumptions to identifying the suspect; containing pieces of wrong information
and accusing innocent people, causing distress amongst friends and family (Boididou, Papadopoulos, Newman, Schifferes, &
Kompatsiaris, 2014) .

It can become problematic when the reliability
of news coming from social networks can have such false trails (Boididou, Papadopoulos, Newman, Schifferes, &
Kompatsiaris, 2014) . What can we do to prevent such issues
of false rumours? How can we distinguish between real and false information? Well,
we can dig deeper into the story to determine the relevance of the content and
look for patterns that may get us to the answer (Boididou, Papadopoulos, Newman, Schifferes, & Kompatsiaris, 2014) . Remember, to always
double check with trusted sources; you never know if the information reported could
be accurate or false.
References
Boididou, C., Papadopoulos, S., Newman, N.,
Schifferes, S., & Kompatsiaris, Y. (2014, March 26). Verification of
Social Media Content for News. Retrieved February 11, 2015, from SNOW
Workshop: http://www.snow-workshop.org/2014/?p=160
Kelly, M. S. (2012, November 5). 8 Social Media Hoaxes You
Fell for This Year. Retrieved February 11, 2015, from Mashable:
http://mashable.com/2012/11/05/social-media-hoaxes/#_
Mitchell, A., Rosentiel, T., & Christian, L. (2012). What
Facebook and Twitter Mean for News. Retrieved February 11, 2015, from The
Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism - The State of the
News Media:
http://www.stateofthemedia.org/2012/mobile-devices-and-news-consumption-some-good-signs-for-journalism/what-facebook-and-twitter-mean-for-news/
Seo, E., Mohapatra, P., & Abdelzaher, T. (n.d.). Identifying
Rumors and Their Sources in Social Networks. Approach, University of
Illinois; University of California, Urbana; Davis. Retrieved February 11, 2015,
from http://spirit.cs.ucdavis.edu/pubs/conf/prasant-spie12.pdf
Great post Kim! Your points are very valid and they are backed up with solid research. The pictures you incorporated assist with the report you are writing. I feel we share a lot of the same opinions, especially on this topic.
ReplyDeleteWoow, thats a lot of work.The statistics shown over here are surprising.
ReplyDeleteI completley agree with you! When it comes to how valid the information is coming from social media, I have a hard time believing some of the things I read. Especially when social media makes it so easy for anyone to post anything, and the post generates quickly but with no evident that it speaks the truth. I enjoyed the posts you shared and I read about the Morgan Freeman issue as well, good idea by including that.
ReplyDelete